
Get in the KNOW
on LA Startups & Tech
XParents Say LAUSD's Virtual Learning Spending Spree Had Mixed Results
Favot is an award-winning journalist and adjunct instructor at USC's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. She previously was an investigative and data reporter at national education news site The 74 and local news site LA School Report. She's also worked at the Los Angeles Daily News. She was a Livingston Award finalist in 2011 and holds a Master's degree in journalism from Boston University and BA from the University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada.

In the sprint to remake education during the pandemic, Los Angeles Unified School District armed half a million students with internet and devices to stay connected, but experts and parents said that its efforts to teach online sometimes fell short and left students behind.
Parents complained of edtech apps that were hard to hear in some cases or ones that were so cumbersome their children avoided them altogether. Some were age inappropriate, being used for elementary age students who had a hard time navigating them.
dot.LA spoke with a half a dozen parents and teachers about the district's effort to build thousands of virtual classrooms across the sprawling district.
Records obtained by dot.LA show the district spent $390 million in emergency funds for its COVID response from March 2020 to April 2021. More than half was spent on tech like laptops, tablets and hotspots and a lab to process COVID tests. Included in that is $23.4 million in spending on several licenses for edtech apps like Edgenuity, Discovery, Rosetta Stone, Blackboard and Edpuzzle.
While many of the edtech apps the district purchased helped students learn, some parents said others were boring and caused frustration.
One parent group gave its own training for parents to help their children connect to their online classes.
The district has not responded to inquiries from dot.LA about their process. But experts said in the speed in which the process took place what was often left unanswered was how the district chose educational apps.
"As an educational technologist, I am in favor of resources being spent on technology. However, there needs to be a transparent process in place," said Tim Green, a professor of educational technology at California State University Fullerton.
An LAUSD spokesperson said the district sought input from teachers and administrators, surveying more than 11,000 people to determine which apps were being used and preferred by educators. The apps were also evaluated to determine whether they met California's curriculum standards and student data privacy policies.
The spokesperson said professional development for the apps was offered to teachers. And resources were available for parents, including a hotline established to provide consultations with live agents. The agents helped families learn how to use tech and virtual apps.
There remain questions about how the district determined which apps to purchase, including whether teachers, parents and students were involved in the decision-making and whether the district provided professional development to help teachers navigate these apps.
But several parents said they were left on their own to help their kids with their assignments at home using these tools.
Parent advocacy organization SpeakUp stepped in and conducted training for parents on how to use Zoom and other tech. They did this because many low-income parents had never accessed the technology before and in many cases didn't speak English, causing huge barriers to navigating the technology, SpeakUP spokesperson Jenny Hontz said.
"We walked parents through that step by step, but the district did not put many resources toward tech proficiency training. And we were only able to help a limited number of parents with our resources," she said, adding that the group had no funding for this.
Hontz said the district spending on devices and hotspots was essential.
Sonia Sanchez, who has three children in LAUSD schools, said an app called Newsela, which helps students with reading comprehension using news articles, was particularly helpful and enjoyable for her kids.
But, she added, Edgenuity was just the opposite.
Sanchez said her son in high school would postpone anything that had to do with Edgenuity, an online curriculum software for K-12 students, because it was going to take him a long time to get through it.
"They dreaded it," she said of all of her kids.
She said the app is educational and has informative lessons, but for her younger children, it was dull. Moreover, she said teachers didn't follow up with their students about what they learned because the entire lesson and assignment was built into the program. Sanchez said she was lucky enough to be able to sit down with her children as they went through lessons to help because she works part-time from home.
Edgenuity is used by school districts across the nation. A BuzzFeed investigation found that during the first year of the pandemic, more than 500 public school districts purchased the Arizona-based company's software, signing contracts that totaled $145 million.
Deborah Rayow, Edgenuity's vice president for instructional design and learning science, told NBC News that its software wasn't designed for the pandemic and it's up to schools to give live instruction.
LAUSD has been using Edgenuity for years for students to make up courses they didn't pass, known as credit recovery. During the pandemic, teachers turned to it as an online teaching platform.
In August, Meghan Gohil enrolled his son in the district's online independent study program through a district school named City of Angels. It was the only way Gohil could keep his 11-year-old son, who can't get vaccinated, enrolled in the district and learning at home. State legislation prevented school districts from holding Zoom classes similar to what was offered when campuses were closed.
"As much complaining as everybody did about Zoom, it was far superior to what they're doing now," Gohil said.
Edgenuity is the program used by City of Angels to facilitate online learning. Gohil and his son came up with a list of problems they've encountered with the software from poor sound quality on some videos to its focus on the amount of time a student has spent on a lesson rather than comprehension.
When asked whether he's going to re-enroll his student at his regular school in Sherman Oaks after his son is vaccinated, Gohil said, "Hell yeah."
He said it looks like his son, normally a straight A student, is going to get a B this semester.
Students across the nation ended the pandemic school year behind. A study by McKinsey & Co. found that elementary students ended the 2020-21 school year four to five months academically behind. And the findings were more dire for Black and Latino students.
In a statement, Edgenuity said it experienced challenges as it quickly scaled to accommodate many more students than it initially expected.
"But in every case, we recognize our role as education and curriculum partners for our school customers comes with great responsibility, and that's why we have worked with our stakeholders to learn from the last academic year and distill those valuable lessons and insights to inform how we have worked with schools as we entered this third interrupted school year," the company said.
It also said it directly worked with LAUSD to provide tools, resources and support.
Gayle Bigyan said her daughters who are in 5th and 6th grades have had positive experiences with edtech apps, including Newsela, Nearpod, Amplify and XtraMath.
"Both of my daughters' reading comprehension, analytical thinking have gotten a lot better because of those platforms, because they used them every day," she said.
She said her fifth grade daughter is now at the top of her class and Bigyan credits the apps in part for getting her there.
She wants teachers to continue using technology even as classes are now in-person.
Teachers also said they also found apps like Newsela and Nearpod beneficial.
Parent Rebecca Cunningham said she wasn't surprised the district spent millions on tech, but she wants the district to be thoughtful on what it will spend going forward.
"Sometimes you throw everything against the wall and see what sticks," she said. "But we need to make sure that we don't just renew those contracts just because. But, instead, we really need to evaluate and find out from the teachers what they are actually using, and what they know how to use."
IXL Learning announced last week LAUSD has renewed its contract with the edtech company, which is used to supplement math and English lessons. The terms of the deal were not disclosed.
The LAUSD spokesperson said it will evaluate which apps it will continue to use.
"We will continue to monitor the needs of our communities and leverage renewal options accordingly," they said. " Regular meetings are held with each digital tool vendor to discuss usage, professional development, and needed implementation support."- What LAUSD Spent on Tech During the Pandemic - dot.LA ›
- Here's How Much LAUSD Spent on Tech During the Pandemic - dot ... ›
- LAUSD's Remote Learning Plans Have Parents Concerned - dot.LA ›
- Netflix Employees, Chappelle Supporters Clash in Walkout - dot.LA ›
- Is It Time to Retire Nielsen? VideoAmp Steps Up - dot.LA ›
- Universal Hydrogen Envisions the Future of Flying - dot.LA ›
- Can 3D Printing Solve LA's Homelessness Problem? - dot.LA ›
- We Are in a Tech Bubble, LA's Top VCs Say - dot.LA ›
- LA County's Game Plan to Vaccinate Children 5-11 - dot.LA ›
- Kicking Off the 2021 dot.LA Summit - dot.LA ›
- Quantum Computing's New Chapter at Caltech - dot.LA ›
- Bird Is Set for its Public Market Debut - dot.LA ›
- Tech's Long Road to Hiring More People of Color - dot.LA ›
- Former Rivian Executive Sues EV Company Ahead of IPO - dot.LA ›
- An App Aimed at LA's Homeless Quietly Grows - dot.LA ›
- Climate Change Is Affecting How LA's Top VCs Invest - dot.LA ›
- Ahead of Rivian IPO, Problems Loom - dot.LA ›
- For Disney Plus, 118 Million New Subscribers Is Not Enough - dot.LA ›
- Ray Bradbury's Venice Home Is Now a Rivian Dealership - dot.LA ›
- High-Stakes Hollywood Union Vote Keeps Big Tech in Suspense - dot.LA ›
- Hollywood Strikes New Deal for the Streaming Era - dot.LA ›
- A New Abuse Report Has Activision Employees Furious... Again - dot.LA ›
- What to Know About Sweetgreen's Closely Watched IPO - dot.LA ›
- Activision Shareholders Call on CEO Bobby Kotick to Resign - dot.LA ›
- How Tech Will Transform LA Public Transportation Next Year - dot.LA ›
- LA Has a Port Problem, But Not the One You're Thinking - dot.LA ›
- How a $2 Billion Courtroom Battle Involving Tinder Might End - dot.LA ›
- Amazon Faces a Series of Black Friday Strikes and Protests - dot.LA ›
- Sold Out on Cyber Monday - dot.LA ›
- Will Anyone Drive Hydrogen Fuel Cars in the EV Era? - dot.LA ›
- Match Pays Tinder Co-Founders $441 Million to End Lawsuit - dot.LA ›
- The Hollywood Agency Betting $200 Million on Gaming's Growth - dot.LA ›
- Why LA's Sheriff Doesn't Want COVID Testing from This LA Company - dot.LA ›
- Another Activision Blizzard Walkout, This Time Over Layoffs - dot.LA ›
- The Latest on the AWS Problems Afflicting the Internet - dot.LA ›
- New Harassment Complaint from Current Blizzard Employee - dot.LA ›
- One Startup Is Impressing Investors with Eye-Popping Growth - dot.LA ›
- Here's What LA's Startup Scene Looks Like Today - dot.LA ›
- These LA Robots Are Cooked Up to Dominate the Food Industry - dot.LA ›
- Rocket Lab to Acquire Solar Panel Maker SolAero - dot.LA ›
- AvantStay's Staycation Business Is Booming - dot.LA ›
- Meet the Hyper-Local Version of DoorDash and Instacart - dot.LA ›
- Feeling Streaming FOMO? This LA Startup Has a Solution - dot.LA ›
- LA's Largest Startup Raises of 2021 - dot.LA ›
- Will the SEC Regulate Crypto in 2022? - dot.LA ›
- How LA County Is Meeting the COVID Testing Crunch - dot.LA ›
- Dave’s SPAC Deal Is Close, and Its Crypto Play Gets Clearer - dot.LA ›
- What LA Tech Firms Have Planned for CES 2022 - dot.LA ›
- Dave's Topsy-Turvy Debut on the Nasdaq - dot.LA ›
- The Biotech Firm Behind LA's At-Home Testing Strategy Struggles - dot.LA ›
- This New LA Unicorn Makes Consumer Data a Quid-Pro-Quo - dot.LA ›
- Using Tech to Give Parents More Childcare Options - dot.LA ›
- This New Fund Hopes to Build More Black-Led Health Startups - dot.LA ›
- Wonder Ventures Devotes a New Fund to LA Startups - dot.LA ›
- Should You Invest in NFTs? We Asked Local Venture Capitalists - dot.LA ›
- Meet the Startups in Grid110's New Cohort - dot.LA ›
- Microsoft Makes a Big Play in LA - dot.LA ›
- Can This New Startup Change Freight in the US? - dot.LA ›
- What To Do With Activision’s Embattled CEO? - dot.LA ›
- A New Union Effort Within Activision - dot.LA ›
- LA's Electric Vehicle Industry Takes a Hit on Wall Street - dot.LA ›
- The Race to Unionize Activision Blizzard - dot.LA ›
- Latino Founders Received Just 2% of Venture Funding in 2021 - dot.LA ›
- Activision Blizzard Accused of Misleading Investors - dot.LA ›
- LA Beverage Startups Experiment with NFTs - dot.LA ›
- Our Survey of the Hottest SoCal Startups of 2022 - dot.LA ›
- A New Studio Aims to Make Films for the Metaverse - dot.LA ›
- A Manufacturing Giant Quietly Rises in the San Fernando Valley - dot.LA ›
- Snap Shares Soar As It Navigates Apple’s Privacy Push - dot.LA ›
- The NFL Brings NFTs to the Super Bowl - dot.LA ›
- SoFi Stadium Is Ready for Its Super Bowl Close Up - dot.LA ›
- 5 Takeaways From a Record-Smashing 2021 for SoCal Startups - dot.LA ›
- These SoCal Firms Want to Bring the Blockchain to Retirement Investing - dot.LA ›
- Autonomous Cars Are Clocking More Test Miles in California - dot.LA ›
- Two Mysterious New Startups in Entertainment Tech - dot.LA ›
- Robots Could Soon Remake Agriculture—For Better and Worse - dot.LA ›
- The Empty Downtown Building That Could House A 'Metaverse Hub' - dot.LA ›
- Why Creator Startup Spotter Is Betting Big on YouTube Stars - dot.LA ›
- LA Is Now America’sThird-Largest Startup Hub - dot.LA ›
- Gangsta Rap Takes to the Blockchain - dot.LA ›
- What We Can Learn From the First 'Crypto Airline' - dot.LA ›
- Hydrogen's Having a Moment in Southern California - dot.LA ›
- Nearly Two-Thirds of LA's Energy Now Comes from Clean Sources - dot.LA ›
- Meet the Robotic Pizza Machine from El Segundo - dot.LA ›
- Video Learning Startup Subject To Tackle Post-Pandemic Education - dot.LA ›
Favot is an award-winning journalist and adjunct instructor at USC's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. She previously was an investigative and data reporter at national education news site The 74 and local news site LA School Report. She's also worked at the Los Angeles Daily News. She was a Livingston Award finalist in 2011 and holds a Master's degree in journalism from Boston University and BA from the University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada.
Subscribe to our newsletter to catch every headline.
Rivian Issues R1T Electric Truck Recall for Faulty Airbag Sensors
David Shultz is a freelance writer who lives in Santa Barbara, California. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Outside and Nautilus, among other publications.
According to a filing from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Rivian’s sensor in the R1T may fail to turn the airbag off when a child or child seat is present on the front passenger side. This could result in airbags deploying and harming the child in a crash. The Irvine-based EV company is reportedly handling the problem by swapping out the defective seats for new ones at service centers. The issue is fully covered under warranty, Rivian says, but until a seat can be swapped, the company recommends keeping children out of the front seat entirely.
Rivian has had a rocky road so far in 2022, with supply chain issues and a massive stock slide causing numerous headaches as the automaker tries to ramp up production. A vaguely positive earnings call last week and good news about a new factory in Georgia suggests that the company may be close to turning the corner. And while annoying, this recall shouldn’t be a major problem for the automaker.
- Rivian Shareholder Sues Over Electric Vehicle Pricing Saga - dot.LA ›
- Rivian's Venice Hub Rethinks Auto Dealerships - dot.LA ›
David Shultz is a freelance writer who lives in Santa Barbara, California. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Outside and Nautilus, among other publications.
Venture Deals in LA Are Slowing Down, And Other Takeaways From Our Quarterly VC Survey
Keerthi Vedantam is a bioscience reporter at dot.LA. She cut her teeth covering everything from cloud computing to 5G in San Francisco and Seattle. Before she covered tech, Keerthi reported on tribal lands and congressional policy in Washington, D.C. Connect with her on Twitter, Clubhouse (@keerthivedantam) or Signal at 408-470-0776.
It looks like venture deals are stagnating in Los Angeles.
That’s according to dot.LA’s most recent quarterly VC sentiment survey, in which we asked L.A.-based venture capitalists for their take on the current state of the market. This time, roughly 83% of respondents reported that the number of deals they made in L.A. either stayed the same or declined in the first quarter of 2022 (58% said they stayed the same compared to the fourth quarter of 2021, while 25% said they decreased).
That’s not hugely surprising given the sluggish dynamics gripping the venture capital world at large these days, due to macroeconomic factors including the ongoing stock market correction, inflation and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While startups and VC investors haven’t been hit as hard as public companies, it looks like the ripple effects are beginning to bleed into the private capital markets.
Image courtesy of Hagan Blount
In addition to slowing deal volumes, most investors said they’re seeing startup valuations lose momentum, as well: Roughly 81% said valuations either stayed the same or decreased from the previous quarter, with nearly 39% noting a decline.
Should that sentiment continue moving forward, it could spell bad news for startups as far as raising the money they need for growth, investors said.
“If I was a startup right now, I would be making sure I have plenty of runway,” said Krisztina ‘Z’ Holly, a venture partner at Good Growth Capital. “When it looks like there's some potential challenges ahead in the market, it’s good to fill your war chest.”
Among VC respondents, about 86% said they believed that valuations in the first quarter were too high—one potential reason why deals slowed down in the first quarter, according to TenOneTen Ventures partner Minnie Ingersoll. She noted that L.A.’s growing startup scene features more early-stage ventures, whose valuations haven’t come down the way later-stage startup valuations have.
“I would say we are just more cautious about taking meetings where the valuations are at pre-correction levels,” Ingersoll said. “We didn’t take meetings because their valuations weren’t in line with where we thought the market was.”
While most respondents said the Russia-Ukraine war didn’t have much impact on their investment strategies, some 22% said it did have an effect—with one VC noting they had to pass on a deal in Russia that they liked.
Is There a Flight Out of Los Angeles?
Los Angeles was heralded as the third-largest startup ecosystem in the U.S. at the beginning of the year, behind only San Francisco and New York. Yet nearly one-third (31%) of VC respondents said that at least one of their portfolio companies had left L.A. within the past year. It won’t come as a huge surprise that the city of Austin, Texas has been one of the prime beneficiaries of this shift—with roughly half of those who reported that a portfolio company had left L.A. identifying Austin as the destination.
The tech industry’s much-hyped “exodus” from California has been widely reported on, especially as more companies have embraced the work-from-home lifestyle and also opted to move their operations to lower-cost cities and states. Most notably, Elon Musk has recently moved two of his companies, electric automaker Tesla and tunnel infrastructure startup The Boring Company, from California to Texas (with both of those firms moving in and around Austin).
“In today's competitive market with lots of capital to invest, we think the next generation of successful VCs are going to be diverse in markets (not just Silicon Valley)... [and] have access to undiscovered founders from everywhere,” said one survey respondent.
NFTs Aren’t Popular With VCs—But Web 3 Is
“It’s the future,” according to one respondent. “Buckle up and get on board.”
Are NFTs...
More than 71% of VC survey respondents said they were bullish on Web3—the new blockchain-enabled iteration of the internet, which promises decentralization and a whole range of applications involving cryptocurrencies, NFTs, DeFi and more. It’s the same sentiment informing Santa Monica-based VC firm M13’s new $400 million fund, which considers Web3 a core piece of its investment thesis.
In Q2 2022, do you expect your portfolio companies to:
L.A. is home to an ever-growing cadre of Web3-focused startups operating across the realms of finance, entertainment and other industries. But while local investors are willing to pour money into blockchain-related ventures, one segment of the space continues to evoke skepticism: Only 18% of respondents would describe NFTs as “a good investment,” while 33% thought they were “bad” investments and 39% said they were unsure.
As in our last survey several months ago, it appears that NFTs continue to divide opinion, with respondents expressing differing perspectives on their value and utility. One referred to them as “get rich quick schemes,” but added that the art pieces and social communities that emerge from them may be valuable. Another said that “NFTs as a digital medium are a legitimate thing”—but noted the vast majority are “awful investments with no intrinsic value.”
Graphics courtesy of Hagan Blount.
Keerthi Vedantam is a bioscience reporter at dot.LA. She cut her teeth covering everything from cloud computing to 5G in San Francisco and Seattle. Before she covered tech, Keerthi reported on tribal lands and congressional policy in Washington, D.C. Connect with her on Twitter, Clubhouse (@keerthivedantam) or Signal at 408-470-0776.
Mother Blames TikTok For Daughter’s Death in ‘Blackout Challenge’ Suit
Christian Hetrick is dot.LA's Entertainment Tech Reporter. He was formerly a business reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer and reported on New Jersey politics for the Observer and the Press of Atlantic City.
The mother of a 10-year-old girl who died after allegedly trying a dangerous online “challenge” has sued Culver City-based TikTok and its Chinese parent company ByteDance, claiming the social media app’s algorithm showed her videos of people choking themselves until they pass out.
Nylah Anderson, an intelligent child who already spoke three languages, was “excruciatingly asphyxiated” and found unconscious in her bedroom on Dec. 7, according to a complaint filed Thursday in federal court in Pennsylvania. She spent five days in pediatric intensive care until succumbing to her injuries.
The lawsuit, filed by her mother Tawainna Anderson, claims TikTok’s algorithm had previously shown Nylah videos depicting the “Blackout Challenge,” in which people hold their breath or choke themselves with household items to achieve a euphoric feeling. That encouraged her to try it herself, the lawsuit alleged.
“The TikTok Defendants’ algorithm determined that the deadly Blackout Challenge was well-tailored and likely to be of interest to 10-year-old Nylah Anderson, and she died as a result,” the suit said.
In a previous statement about Nylah’s death, a TikTok spokesperson noted the “disturbing” challenge predates TikTok, pointing to a 2008 warning from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about deadly choking games. The spokesperson claimed the challenge “has never been a TikTok trend.” The app currently doesn’t produce any search results for “Blackout Challenge” or a related hashtag.
“We remain vigilant in our commitment to user safety and would immediately remove related content if found,” the TikTok statement said. “Our deepest sympathies go out to the family for their tragic loss.”
At least four other children or teens have died after allegedly attempting the Blackout Challenge, according to the Anderson lawsuit. TikTok has grappled with dangerous challenges on its platform before, including one in which people tried to climb a stack of milk crates. That was considered so dangerous that TikTok banned the hashtag associated with it last year. In February, TikTok updated its content rules to combat the dangerous acts and other harmful content.
The Anderson lawsuit comes as lawmakers and state attorneys general scrutinize how TikTok and other social media can be bad for teens and younger users, including by damaging their mental health, causing negative feelings about their body image and making them addicted to the apps.
- Banning Snapchat Drug Sales Is 'Top Priority,' Snap Says - dot.LA ›
- TikTok Updates Content Rules and Guidelines - dot.LA ›
Christian Hetrick is dot.LA's Entertainment Tech Reporter. He was formerly a business reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer and reported on New Jersey politics for the Observer and the Press of Atlantic City.