This ChatGPT Competitor Wants to Remember Everything for You, Forever
Samson Amore is a reporter for dot.LA. He holds a degree in journalism from Emerson College. Send tips or pitches to samsonamore@dot.la and find him on Twitter @Samsonamore.
What if you could never forget any memory ever again?
Thatβs the question at the heart of San Diego-based artificial intelligence company Personal.ai. Formerly named Human AI, the company recently raised $7.8 million in seed funding led by Differential VC and Supernode Global to continue to develop its app, a fluent digital clone of yourself that remembers all the information you feed it at a momentβs notice, while also constantly learning and evolving with every input.
I had recently seen the Blumhouse horror flick βM3gan,β in which an android doll performs this very function for her owner, a child named Cady. So naturally, when I heard about this less creepy (and more real) concept, I was eager to give the platform a try.
The app works by training on information you give it about yourself through text, image or URL inputs. That could include info from your daily itinerary, your personal website or even intimate details about your life and relationships. As it learns, it mimics the way you speak to it, with the goal of becoming an artificial clone of your hippocampus. Once the training is complete, in theory the AI should be able to recall all the information you give it within a few seconds of being prompted.

That said, according to Personal.aiβs head of finance Jonathan Bikoff, the AI is βnot a replacement for you, itβs a supplement.β Most of the app is built on Personal.aiβs proprietary AI system called GCT-1, which learns from personal data, unlike ChatGPTβs popular GPT-3 model trained on publicly available data online. This means GCT-1 provides more limited, but also more tailored personal responses. In other words, itβs more likely to know your schedule from two years ago based on your input than it is to know the name of the current president.
Personal.ai's head of finance Jonathan Bikoff
Photo: Personal.ai/Bikoff.
But there is a component of Personal.aiβs model that does use GPT-3. Part of the app that lets users give the AI more detailed prompts and receive longer generative replies is based on the GPT-3 model, Bikoff said.
Everything you do on Personal.ai has the option to be added to the AIβs βmemory stack,β a repository of all itβs learned. Most of the time, the user has to manually select this button before inputting commands or questions.
The main hurdle, for both me and the AI, was training it. First, I input my bio from the dot.LA website, recent clips and a link to my own online portfolio. Then I asked the AI to tell me if it knew things like when I got my degree and from where and when I began specific jobs.
Once the AI quickly learned my basic background, it was on to the fun part β trying to get it to glitch. That proved harder than expected. When asking the AI βwhat is your name,β it replied, βmy name is Samson,β and when I asked βwho are you,β expecting a regular response like βI am a journalist based in Los Angeles,β the AI instead uncannily replied, βI am a person, albeit an artificial one.β
Each AI response has a meter to track accuracy, relevance and fluency β basically the AIβs confidence in its answer β which should theoretically increase the more you train it, something I found to be true. Thereβs also an emoji function that gives the AI an βemotionalβ response. It felt βanxiousβ when it didnβt know the answer to a question and βnostalgicβ when reminiscing about past conversations.
I was mostly careful about what I input, only giving it source material thatβs already been published online. Thatβs more of my own tech reporter paranoia than it is a recommendation by the Personal.ai team. But I imagine others will also share my reluctance.
That said, Personal.ai uses a third-party decentralized service Oasis to secure the data on the blockchain. Personal.ai CEO Suman Kanuganti said that users own all their data within the app, and that it isnβt aggregated or βsent to big tech.β
Kanuganti also claimed the company canβt see how youβre training your AI: βUsers will control the input and output, when and where [and] the company cannot access data,β he said.
Since launching in 2020 Personal.ai has existed as a desktop app. But Bikoff and CEO Suman Kanuganti said the plan is to develop it into a standalone mobile app with a messaging feature so users can communicate with each otherβs AIs. To do so, of course, you have to be on the app to message other AIs and can only send AI replies through it. Messages coming from the AI will be marked as such, so people know when theyβre communicating with the βrealβ you or not. But if the AI learns enough about you, the texts should be eventually indistinguishable.
βBy simply messaging people, friends and family and colleagues, your AI is learning so much about you, and itβs able to generate better and better draft responses for you to send, saving you time and helping you remember things,β Bikoff added.
Right now the desktop app costs $40/month, but Bikoff said the plan is to reduce that subscription price soon.
Despite the obvious work applications, Bikoff said Personal.ai is designed to be for the general public first. βThis is an assistant to help with everyday communications, whether youβre 18 or 80 years old,β Bikoff said.
For his part, Bikoff uses the AI to keep track of which reporters heβs speaking to, his to-do lists, and upcoming travel plans. He added that older users might find the AI beneficial as an everyday assistant as their memory degrades. Hence why he believes onboarding to the app,βshould be as easy as iMessage.β
βIf you can send a text message, you can train your own AI,β Bikoff added.
Some issues I ran into were that the appβs search function was hyper-specific. Looking for GPT-3 without the hyphen didnβt produce the memory I was searching for: Iβd previously asked the AI to define the difference between GPT-3 and Personal.aiβs GCT-1 model. The AI also had to be trained every time it was wrong, otherwise it wouldnβt learn which answers were incorrect. For example, when I asked for the date,it would repeatedly tell me the wrong date, unless I corrected it. But unlike humans, the AI only makes a mistake once; when I relayed the same question a few minutes later it knew the right answer.
I also asked the AI to write me a kicker for this story based on Personal.aiβs press releases.It spit out that, βwhile these AIs can perform many tasks, from managing our schedules to providing customer service, their true potential lies in their ability to generate new ideas and solutions.β
Thatβs not exactly what I had in mind. But I canβt blame the AI for being biased.
- The Learning Perv: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Lensaβs NSFW AI βΊ
- Vocal Deepfakes Are Here To Make You Question Who You're Listening To βΊ
- Would Biden's Proposed AI 'Bill of Rights' Be EffectiveβOr Just More Virtue Signaling? βΊ
- LAFC Has A New Teammate: AI - dot.LA βΊ
- Are ChatGPT and Other AI Apps Politically Biased? - dot.LA βΊ
- AI Still Has a Ways to Go Before it Truly Impacts Politics - dot.LA βΊ
- AI Is Helping Job Recruiters Choose Employees - dot.LA βΊ
Samson Amore is a reporter for dot.LA. He holds a degree in journalism from Emerson College. Send tips or pitches to samsonamore@dot.la and find him on Twitter @Samsonamore.




