

Get in the KNOW
on LA Startups & Tech
X
Image by Pixels Hunter/ Shutterstock
At UCLA, Professors See 'Exciting Opportunities' in AI Writing Tools
Nat Rubio-Licht
Nat Rubio-Licht is a freelance reporter with dot.LA. They previously worked at Protocol writing the Source Code newsletter and at the L.A. Business Journal covering tech and aerospace. They can be reached at nat@dot.la.
Generative AI is tech’s latest buzz word, with developers creating programs that can do anything from writing an academic essay about guitars and elevators to creating photorealistic paintings of majestic cats.
ChatGPT, a platform built by DALL-E 2 and GPT-3 founder OpenAI, is the latest one of these tools to go viral. But this tool can go far beyond writing a version of the Declaration of Independence in the style of Jar Jar Binks. It has the capability to write full essays on almost any subject a college kid could desire — creating another layer of complex technology that humanities professors now have to consider when they teach and dole out assignments.
\u201cSo #ChatGPT can easily write college essays now. Turnitin won't touch this. So are we ready to rethink assessment yet?\u201d— Colin D. Wren (@Colin D. Wren) 1670580381
While ChatGPT does have some limitations (It can only write up to 650 words per prompt), some students have taken to Reddit to talk about the potential uses and workarounds of the word limit to help them pass their classes. Ironically, another student even used the AI to write an apology email to his professor for using AI to write his emails.
One student wrote, “As finals are hitting, I’ve written 6 papers for people and made a great chunk of change. Same day turnaround, any size paper with perfect grammar and in depth writing plagiarism free is a pretty lucrative way to advertise oneself to a bunch of cracked out stressed college students.”
But despite the tool’s internet virality among desperate college students, UCLA professors told dot.LA that they aren’t worried about ChatGPT’s capabilities. Rather than viewing the technology as something they have to shield students from using, they see it as another potential tool in their arsenal and something they can implement in their classrooms.
\u201cI asked ChatGPT to write an essay on mental health. Returned essay immediately. College professors don\u2019t need to worry; the essay contained mostly weak verbs and no advanced grammar.\u201d— Heather Holleman (@Heather Holleman) 1670419435
“My sense of ChatGPT is that it's actually a really exciting opportunity to reconsider what it is that we do when we write things like essays,” said Danny Snelson, assistant professor of English at UCLA. “Rather than raising questions of academic integrity, this should have us asking questions about what kinds of assignments we give our students.”
Snelson tried ChatGPT out for himself, prompting the platform to write an essay about “the literary merit of video games that cites three key scholars in the field.” As it does, ChatGPT instantaneously churned out an essay which answered the prompt accurately and synthesized the arguments of three scholars in a compelling way. But Snelson could spot flaws in its work. The writing style was repetitive and the scholars the AI chose were not diverse.
“I probably will give my students the assignment on the first day of class to write a ChatGPT essay about a topic they know nothing about,” Snelson says. “Then have them discuss the essays that ChatGPT has written for them and what the limits of their arguments are.”
Christine Holten, director of Writing Programs and the UCLA Undergraduate Writing Center, said that she and other instructors are currently having similar talks about how to integrate these tools in a responsible way.
“One way is to allow students to use them,” she said. “Build them into the course, and allow reflection about the bounds of their use, what their limitations are, what are their advantages? How does it change their composing?”
Along with dissecting the platform’s limitations, Snelson also sees using ChatGPT as a tool to propel students’ writing even further. For example, one of the hardest parts about writing an essay is the first line. Having an AI write it for you can be a great starting point to push past the “blank page dilemma,” he said.
And while ChatGPT can write a passable essay on almost any subject, Snelson said students still need to have an understanding of the subjects they’re writing about. “Having a live conversation about Chaucer in the classroom, a student is not going to be helped by an AI,” he said.
“In the real world, you have access to information, you have access to writing tools,” Snelson added. “Why should (academics) disavow or disallow those kinds of tools?”
To that end, Holten said she recognizes that ChatGPT “raises the stakes” by circumventing tools that academics have relied on to detect plagiarism. But students turning in papers that aren’t their own isn’t new: Essay mills have existed for a long time, and Instagram is filled with pages that will sell students an academic paper.
“We have to do our part by trying to craft assignments carefully and making sure that we're not assigning these open-ended prompts of the sort that could be bought from paper mills,” she said.
It helps, too, that ChatGPT may already be working on a solution. Scott Aaronson, who works on the theoretical foundations of AI safety at OpenAI, said in a blog post that he’s working on a tool for “statistically watermarking the outputs of a text model like GPT” that adds in an “otherwise unnoticeable secret signal in its choices of words” to prevent things like academic plagiarism, mass generation of propaganda or impersonating someone’s writing style to incriminate them, though it's unclear how far away this development is.
“We want it to be much harder to take a GPT output and pass it off as if it came from a human,” Aaronson wrote.
All of which explains why even despite claims that high-school English and the student essay are nearing their death knell, Holten thinks, ultimately, “The availability of ChatGPT is not likely to change very much.”From Your Site Articles
- Meet the 24-Year-Old Trying to Disrupt the Intellectual Property Industry ›
- Microsoft in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI - dot.LA ›
- LAFC Has A New Teammate: AI - dot.LA ›
- Buzzfeed and CNET to Automate More Content Using OpenAI - dot.LA ›
- How Redditors Successfully 'Jailbroke' ChatGPT - dot.LA ›
- Generative AI: Tech Startup Savior or Buzzy Nothingburger? - dot.LA ›
- Generative AI: Tech Startup Savior or Buzzy Nothingburger? - dot.LA ›
- How Dot.LA Readers Are Using AI in a Professional Setting - dot.LA ›
- How USC Plans to Teach AI in New Computing School - dot.LA ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Nat Rubio-Licht
Nat Rubio-Licht is a freelance reporter with dot.LA. They previously worked at Protocol writing the Source Code newsletter and at the L.A. Business Journal covering tech and aerospace. They can be reached at nat@dot.la.
nat@dot.la
PCH Driven: 75 and Sunny’s Wil Chockley on How to Pitch Your Startup
01:26 PM | January 10, 2022
Courtesy of Will Chockley
On this episode of the PCH Driven podcast, 75 and Sunny venture firm partner Wil Chockley shares his thoughts on skills early-stage founders need and advice on how to give the best pitch possible.
The pandemic quickly changed how the tech world worked, creating an exodus of people from the Bay Area to L.A., Chockley said, as jobs went remote and lockdowns forced people to decide where they wanted to be stuck, at least for the short term.
"I think that influx of new tech blood has really helped the tech scene. But prior to all of that, L.A. was already sort of a robust hub for innovation and the core areas geographically for a few industries like aerospace… And then entertainment," said Chockley.
Chockley is a partner at 75 and Sunny, a venture firm founded by Zillow co-founder Spencer Rascoff, who also co-founded dot.LA. Chockley assesses potential investments; about a third of his time, he said, is spent looking at prospects in proptech, but he's also interested in what he calls “HR tech” or the future of work.
On the fundraising side, Chockley has learned what skills to look out for in founders. The single most important ability, he said, is storytelling. Being able to translate a company’s data while also painting a vision for its future takes craft.
"You are first selling your idea to investors; you're selling your idea then to potential employees when you're looking to hire them. And then you're looking to sell your product or your idea to potential customers. So being able to sell well is being able to tell a story well," said Chockley.
The pandemic, he added, has opened more funding avenues for founders in every city. Zoom video calls have become the norm for the venture capital industry, allowing startups to get funding from investors outside of Silicon Valley and far from their headquarters.
"I feel like everything has merged, so everyone is interacting with everybody. And so, what's happening here in L.A. is really what's happening all over the country," said Chockley.
While making those pitches to investors, Chockley said some things to keep in mind is to be enthusiastic and be receptive to feedback. But also when you introduce the problem, your product is the solution.
Click the playhead above to hear the full conversation, and subscribe to PCH Driven on Apple, Stitcher, Spotify, iHeart, Google or wherever you get your podcasts.
dot.LA Engagement Intern Joshua Letona contributed to this post.
From Your Site Articles
- How to Fundraise Your Seed Round - dot.LA ›
- What Spencer Rascoff Looks for in a Founder - dot.LA ›
- Recon Food's Sophia Rascoff on the Future of Social Media - dot.LA ›
- How to Pitch Your Startup - dot.LA ›
- HydroFlask’s Travis Rosbach is a ‘True Water Man’ - dot.LA ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read moreShow less
Jamie Williams
Jamie Williams is the host of the “PCH Driven” podcast, a show about Southern California entrepreneurs, innovators and its driven leaders on their road to success. The series celebrates and reveals the wonders of the human spirit and explores the motivations behind what drives us.
Despite the Critiques, Gen Z Swears by Influencer Marketing
05:05 AM | February 15, 2023
@DixieDamelio, @NoahBeck, @Jaclynrjohnson
After an influx of scandals, some reports suggest that beauty influencers have run their course. Just look at the de-influcing trend—people are outwardly expressing frustration with the sheer amount of sponsored content being pushed on every social media platform. Others are questioning the pervasive misleading reviews and undisclosed advertisements.
That said, the money flowing into the industry, paints a different picture. Even as companies slash their marketing budgets, they are still setting aside cash for creators. An Influencer Marketing Hub survey found that 23% of brands dedicated at least 40% of their entire marketing budget to influencer content. And the industry is set to reach $21 this year. A January report from shopping platform LTK, which surveyed 1,018 people, found that both Gen Z and millennials consider seeing a product from influencers as more persuasive than other forms of advertising.
So how do we explain these two conflicting signals?
For starters, Gen Z has historically been hard to reach with advertising, and ads coming from influencers are no exception. A 2022 study from digital consumer research firm Bulbshare found that 84% of Gen Z no longer trust influencers. But consumer trends point to the consistent effectiveness of creator-led campaigns. LTK’s survey found that 79% of Gen Z respondents said their shopping was informed by social media. Brands like the fashion companies Selkie and Shein have seen sales explode after strategic partnerships with TikTok influencers.
That said, a looming recession, does lead people to be more particular about what they buy. Consumer price increases have slightly slowed down, but prices for products like apparel are still high. If people are reducing their spending, some have argued that influencers, who make their living off of other people’s purchasing habits, will lose their social significance.
Again, the evidence suggests the opposite to be true. People working with a budget want to make more informed decisions. When they, for example, walk into Sephora, they want to know that they aren’t going to waste $40 on a bad foundation. This is why influencers aren’t going anywhere: people who hunt for the best product before buying something are going to come across an influencer’s TikTok video or Instagram post. Seeing a video doesn’t always lead to a purchase, but people might find the information persuasive enough.
Another alternative is the rise in micro-influencers—people who have cultivated a more personable sense of trust instead of someone with millions of followers. With more people using TikTok as a search engine, the time seems ripe for influencer marketing to help consumers navigate their course.
Not only did the LTK survey find that 44% of Gen Z’s in-store shopping is informed by creator-recommended products, but they are also more likely to search for product information from an influencer instead of a brand’s website.
Which is to say, even those with disdain for influencer culture have likely been inundated with the trendy products they push. All the evidence points to influencers being one of the most persuasive tools in marketing—and you’d be foolish to think that recent developments are signs of trouble.
From Your Site Articles
- TikTok Is Giving Creators a New Way To Earn Ad Revenue ›
- PR Firm Carter Agency Allegedly Scammed Hundreds of Influencers Out of Brand Deals ›
- The Wild West of Influencer Taxes ›
- Meet the Glassdoor For Influencers ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read moreShow less
Kristin Snyder
Kristin Snyder is dot.LA's 2022/23 Editorial Fellow. She previously interned with Tiger Oak Media and led the arts section for UCLA's Daily Bruin.
https://twitter.com/ksnyder_db
RELATEDTRENDING
LA TECH JOBS