

Get in the KNOW
on LA Startups & Tech
X
Photo by Benjamin Child on Unsplash
Why a Startup Needs a Board: The Why and How of Constructing a Board Early
Spencer Rascoff
Spencer Rascoff serves as executive chairman of dot.LA. He is an entrepreneur and company leader who co-founded Zillow, Hotwire, dot.LA, Pacaso and Supernova, and who served as Zillow's CEO for a decade. During Spencer's time as CEO, Zillow won dozens of "best places to work" awards as it grew to over 4,500 employees, $3 billion in revenue, and $10 billion in market capitalization. Prior to Zillow, Spencer co-founded and was VP Corporate Development of Hotwire, which was sold to Expedia for $685 million in 2003. Through his startup studio and venture capital firm, 75 & Sunny, Spencer is an active angel investor in over 100 companies and is incubating several more.
If your business is a corporation, you are required by law to have a board of directors. For many startups, it can seem like just an option. However, there are many reasons startups should aim to form their own board of directors early in their lifecycle.
Does Your Startup Need a Board of Directors?
Yes. Even for experienced founders, a new company comes with new challenges — and an opportunity to make all new mistakes. For first-time founders, you don’t know what you don’t know. The best way to avoid many of these mistakes is to surround yourself with experienced counsel, and a board is a way to formalize that. The primary job of a board of directors is to look out for shareholders' interests, oversee corporate activities, assess performance, assess the CEO and senior management and give feedback about the future direction of the company. Your board should help provide advice and mentorship from people who have been there, done that.
When Should Your Startup Form a Board?
As you start to think about your board as founder and/or CEO, the board can initially be as small as just one director: you.
As the startup grows and evolves over funding rounds, you should expand and include more members. The most standard time to form a board is after the Series A funding round, but some startups choose to after the seed round. Typically, the board expands as the company does from two to three directors (including the CEO) around the Series A, to five to seven directors when the company is in the Series C/D stage to seven to nine directors as it is preparing to go public.
I prefer boards on the smaller side because they can be more collaborative and interactive, but as you create board committees, you will need a larger board in order to have two to three directors on each committee.
Who Should Serve On Your Startup's Board?
One of the best ways to fill a board of directors is to find the people you wish you could hire but may be in positions where it’s not really feasible. For a startup, you should aim for a board with three to five directors. This should include one or more in each of the following categories: the founder, an investor in the company and an independent director.
You’ll want to have some of your investors on the board because they are the ones most rooting for and affected by the financial success of the company. This will also allow them a small measure of control and visibility into the company's progress. Keep in mind it’s important to keep cultivating these relationships for when you need to raise capital down the road.
Additionally, it’s important to have one or more independent directors — a person who is neither an employee nor an investor in the company — on the board early. Ideally, you’ll be able to find another founder, peer, colleague or acquaintance who has been in your seat before and can bring a clear, objective perspective to board discussions. A trusted independent director can let you know if you’re missing an opportunity or taking a step in the wrong direction. Plus, most importantly, help navigate the challenges that arise when the investor board directors may have a different perspective from or disagree with the operating board directors.
Lastly, the diversity of your board is also extremely important. Groups from different backgrounds, genders, races and perspectives make better decisions and improve business outcomes. I recently had a conversation with CNBC’s Julia Boorstin at the dot.LA Summit about this very thing.
A Board Success Story
Throughout my countless years working and growing with boards, I’ve had many opportunities to see just how important a good BoD is. A great example of when a board decision aided my company and me more than expected is from my time at Zillow.
Prior to 2008, investors were looking to invest more money into Zillow — which we didn’t need at the time. One of our board members, Bill Gurley, gave the great advice of “take the hors d'oeuvres when they’re being passed” or take the money when it’s being offered. We ended up taking on the new capital and it was good that we did. When the 2008 financial crisis hit, the extra capital allowed Zillow to weather the storm and take advantage of the moment to expand more aggressively when the market was up for grabs.
It’s small moments like this that led to bigger successes down the road and prove the importance of having a board early.
Final Thoughts
Your board of directors should help you navigate challenges and serve as a trusted sounding board (pun intended) when you need advice. Something most, if not all, founders know by now is that startups are dynamic and constantly evolving, so as your startup scales your board will too. And if you build the foundations of your board thoughtfully, it will aid your startup in the years to come.
From Your Site Articles
- Brian Lee Offers Lessons From Being A 4-Time Startup Founder ... ›
- Brex Co-Founder on Why He Moved to LA, Startups and Remote Work ›
- How To Structure Your Startup's Board: From Pre-Seed to IPO - dot.LA ›
- Three Tips for Working With Your Start-Up Board - dot.LA ›
- Three Tips for Working With Your Start-Up Board - dot.LA ›
- Three Tips for Working With Your Start-Up Board - dot.LA ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Spencer Rascoff
Spencer Rascoff serves as executive chairman of dot.LA. He is an entrepreneur and company leader who co-founded Zillow, Hotwire, dot.LA, Pacaso and Supernova, and who served as Zillow's CEO for a decade. During Spencer's time as CEO, Zillow won dozens of "best places to work" awards as it grew to over 4,500 employees, $3 billion in revenue, and $10 billion in market capitalization. Prior to Zillow, Spencer co-founded and was VP Corporate Development of Hotwire, which was sold to Expedia for $685 million in 2003. Through his startup studio and venture capital firm, 75 & Sunny, Spencer is an active angel investor in over 100 companies and is incubating several more.
https://twitter.com/spencerrascoff
https://www.linkedin.com/in/spencerrascoff/
admin@dot.la
The Streaming Era Just Ate the Studio Era
10:45 AM | December 06, 2025
🔦 Spotlight
Hello Los Angeles!
In a week where everyone was already arguing about what “the future of entertainment” is supposed to look like, Netflix decided to skip the debate and buy a giant piece of the past and, possibly, the future. Netflix announced a definitive agreement to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s Studios and Streaming business, including Warner Bros. film and television studios plus HBO and HBO Max. This is not just another media merger. It is a power transfer, from the studio era where the gatekeepers were greenlight committees to the platform era where the gatekeepers are subscriber relationships, home screens, and retention math.
Here are the bones of the deal. WBD shareholders would receive $27.75 per share, made up of $23.25 in cash and $4.50 in Netflix stock, with the stock portion subject to a symmetrical collar. Netflix puts the transaction at roughly $72 billion in equity value and $82.7 billion in enterprise value, and expects it to close in 12 to 18 months, but only after WBD completes its planned separation of its Global Networks business into Discovery Global, now expected in Q3 2026.
Now zoom in on why this matters in Los Angeles specifically.
LA’s creative engine is about to be run by a single, very efficient distribution machine
Warner Bros. is not just a studio. It is an institutional muscle memory for how to develop, package, and produce at scale, plus a library and franchises that can carry a business through multiple economic cycles. Netflix is not just a distributor. It is the largest direct to consumer entertainment subscription platform on earth, built around global reach, product iteration, and data feedback loops. Put them together and you get a company that can create, market, distribute, and monetize premium entertainment without needing anyone else’s permission.
That will sound exciting to some creators and terrifying to others, often for the same reason. When the same entity owns the audience relationship and the content factory, it can take bigger swings because it has more margin for error. It can also take fewer swings because it does not need to. The incentive shifts from “What is culturally important?” to “What makes people stay?” Those are sometimes the same question. Sometimes they are not.
This deal won’t be decided in a writers’ room. It’ll be decided by regulators.
This is exactly the type of consolidation regulators have been itching to interrogate. A combined Netflix plus HBO Max instantly raises questions about market power, competition, and pricing, plus downstream effects on theaters, independent studios, and negotiating leverage with talent. Even if Netflix vows to maintain current operations and keep the consumer experience strong, the political story is straightforward: fewer giant buyers typically means less bargaining power for everyone who sells into the system.
Also worth noting, Reuters reports a termination fee of $5.8 billion under certain circumstances, which tells you both sides are bracing for a drawn out, high scrutiny process.
The quiet subtext: the bundle is coming back, just wearing a streaming hoodie
Netflix will almost certainly pitch this as more choice and better value. Regulators will hear less competition. Consumers will hear how much is this going to cost me. The most plausible end state is not a single mega app on day one. It is a reimagined bundle: separate brands, packaged pricing, shared sign on, cross promotion, and eventually tighter integration if the politics and churn math allow it.
The real disruption is not whether HBO Max keeps its name. It is whether Netflix becomes the default front door to premium scripted entertainment globally.
🤝 Venture Deals
LA Companies
- Castelion, a Torrance based defense technology startup, raised a $350M Series B round led by Altimeter Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners, with participation from investors including Andreessen Horowitz, General Catalyst, Lavrock Ventures, Space VC, Avenir and Interlagos Capital. The money will be used to scale production of its Blackbeard hypersonic weapon, stand up its Project Ranger manufacturing campus in New Mexico, and support multiservice testing and integration with U.S. Army and Navy platforms starting in 2026. - learn more
- Antares announced a $96M Series B to accelerate an iterative “build, test, iterate” approach to developing nuclear reactors quickly, with the funding going toward hardware and subsystem testing, fuel fabrication, manufacturing, and the infrastructure to turn on a reactor. The company says it plans a low-power “Mark-0” reactor demonstration in 2026 at Idaho National Laboratory, with a pathway to a full-power electricity-producing reactor as early as 2027 and a commercial prototype microreactor (“Mark-1”) after the Mark-0 milestone. - learn more
LA Venture Funds
- With FirstLook Partners participating, Flex raised a $60M Series B led by Portage, bringing its total equity raised to $105M to build an AI native finance platform for middle market business owners. The company says it will use the new funding to accelerate product expansion and scale its AI agent infrastructure across areas like private credit, business finance, personal finance, payments, and ERP. - learn more
- Led by MTech Capital, Curvestone AI raised a $4M seed round with participation from Boost Capital Partners, D2 Fund, and Portfolio Ventures to scale its AI automation platform for regulated industries like financial services, legal, and insurance. The company says it’s tackling the “compound error” problem that makes multi step AI workflows unreliable, and will use the funding to accelerate product development and go to market expansion. - learn more
- Co-led by CIV, Unlimited Industries raised a $12M seed round (alongside Andreessen Horowitz) to scale its “AI-native construction” approach to designing and building major infrastructure projects. The company says its platform can generate and evaluate massive numbers of design configurations to optimize for cost, safety, and performance, cutting pre-construction engineering timelines from months to weeks, and it is initially focusing on projects that rapidly expand U.S. power capacity for things like data centers, critical minerals, and advanced manufacturing. - learn more
- With Hyperion Capital participating (alongside Amplify Venture Partners, Spark Capital, Tamarack Global and others), Antithesis raised a $105M Series A led by Jane Street, which is both an investor and an existing customer. The company says it will use the capital to accelerate its deterministic simulation testing platform and scale go to market efforts across North America, Europe, and Asia, positioning the product as “critical infrastructure” for teams running complex distributed systems. - learn more
- With XO Ventures participating, Orq.ai raised an oversubscribed €5M seed round led by seed + speed Ventures and Galion.exe to help enterprises build, deploy, and manage production grade AI agents with stronger control over data, behavior, and compliance. The company says the funding will accelerate expansion of its platform, including its newly launched Agent Studio and managed runtime, as it pushes to close the “AI production gap” for companies moving beyond demos into real deployment. - learn more
- Untapped Ventures participated in Lemurian Labs’ oversubscribed $28M Series A, co-led by Pebblebed Ventures and Hexagon, as the company builds a software-first platform designed to run AI workloads efficiently across any hardware and across edge, cloud, and on-prem environments. Lemurian says the funding will help it expand engineering, accelerate product development, and deepen ecosystem collaborations aimed at reducing vendor lock in and infrastructure costs. - learn more
- Fifth Wall and Park Rangers Capital participated in Ridley’s $6.4M seed round, which Fifth Wall led, backing the company’s push to rebuild the real estate process around consumers with fewer commission-heavy frictions. Ridley says the capital will help launch an AI-powered buy-side experience that surfaces private, for-sale, and “soon-to-be-listed” homes using predictive analytics, while also expanding its commission-free seller tools and “Preferred Agents” network for on-demand support. - learn more
- Anthos Capital participated in Kalshi’s $1B Series E at an $11B valuation, a round led by Paradigm with other backers including Sequoia, Andreessen Horowitz, Meritech, IVP, ARK Invest, CapitalG, and Y Combinator. Kalshi says its trading volume now exceeds $1B per week across 3,500+ markets, and it will use the new capital to accelerate consumer adoption, integrate more brokerages, strike news partnerships, and expand product offerings. - learn more
Read moreShow less
Inside Tinder’s 380-Matches-Per-Second Sunday
09:26 AM | January 09, 2026
🔦 Spotlight
Happy New Year, Los Angeles. 💘
If you want a clear read on how people actually behave when the calendar flips, you do not need a survey. You need Tinder’s Dating Sunday data. The numbers below are from January 2025, compared with 2024, and they show a pattern the app sees every year when millions of people log in and take their love life off pause.
🔥 Tinder’s Annual Traffic Spike, By The Numbers
On Dating Sunday, the first Sunday of the year, Tinder hit its biggest activity spike on the calendar. Compared with the app’s typical daily averages for that year, and trends versus the prior year:
📈 Swipes were nearly 13% higher
💬 Messages were nearly 10% higher
❤️ Likes were over 10% higher
🗣️ Users had almost 7% more conversations
🤝 Matches climbed to about 380 matches per second, roughly a 10% lift compared to the rest of the year
Across Peak Season, from January 1 through February 14, Tinder saw on the order of 10 million more messages per day and roughly 40 million additional likes than its non peak baseline.
The figures are from last January, but the shape of this curve is remarkably consistent year after year, which is why they are a solid proxy for what is happening again at the start of 2026.
⚡ Not Just More Use, Different Use
What makes the Dating Sunday data more interesting than a simple “usage went up” story is how behavior shifted compared with the same day the year before.
Users replied about 2 hours and 25 minutes faster on average while also sending more messages, more likes and starting more conversations. That looks less like background swiping and more like a concentrated intent spike, people coming back to the app with a clear goal and actually engaging.
From a product and infrastructure perspective, that turns this one Sunday into a full stack exercise. Ranking, recommendations, notifications, trust and safety and core scale all get hammered at once, with high signal data flooding the system over a short window. Most apps only see that kind of behavior during a one off viral moment or a big launch. Tinder sees it every January.
📊 What The Surge Actually Signals
There is plenty of talk about people being tired of apps. The behavior here tells a more nuanced story.
When the calendar flipped last year, people reopened Tinder, used it more, started more conversations and replied faster than they had the year before. That does not look like a category that has lost its grip on users. It looks like a mature consumer network that can still generate predictable, measurable spikes of attention and intent on cue.
If those patterns hold, the first few weeks of 2026 once again look less like a slow reset and more like a live load test for an LA built product at global scale.
Now keep scrolling for this week’s LA venture deals, fund announcements and acquisitions.
🤝 Venture Deals
LA Companies
- Cambium, an El Segundo based advanced materials startup, raised a $100M Series B led by 8VC. The company uses AI, chemical informatics and high-performance computing to design new polymers and composites for defense, aerospace and other high-performance sectors, and will use the funding to accelerate its product pipeline and scale manufacturing capacity across the U.S. and Europe following its acquisition of SHD. - learn more
LA Venture Funds
- Plus Capital joined Pomelo Care’s $92M Series C, backing the New York based virtual care company at a $1.7B valuation alongside lead investor Stripes, Andreessen Horowitz, Atomico, BoxGroup and SV Angel. Pomelo, which already covers about 25 million lives and nearly 7% of U.S. births, will use the funding to take its proven, outcomes-driven maternity model and expand it across women’s and children’s health more broadly, from reproductive care and pediatrics through hormonal health, perimenopause and menopause. - learn more
- Kittyhawk Frontier is leading a $2M seed round in Denver based encoord, joining new and existing investors to back the company’s grid-planning software platform. encoord’s flagship product, SAInt, is designed to give utilities, developers, data centers and grid operators an integrated financial and operational view of the power system, helping cut interconnection timelines by up to five years and optimize capital planning. The new capital will go toward expanding the team, advancing the platform and scaling into key markets as demand for smarter, electrification-ready grid planning tools accelerates. - learn more
- Alexandria Real Estate Equities participated in Mediar Therapeutics’ oversubscribed $76M Series B, joining new investors like Longwood Fund and Asahi Kasei Pharma Ventures in a round co-led by Amplitude Ventures and ICG. The Boston-based biotech will use the funding to advance its first-in-class fibrosis portfolio, including MTX-474, now in a global Phase 2a trial for systemic sclerosis, and MTX-439, which is moving into Phase 1 studies for fibrosis associated with chronic kidney disease, alongside its partnered MTX-463 program with Eli Lilly. - learn more
- GordonMD Global Investments joined Soley Therapeutics’ $200M Series C, backing the South San Francisco based biotech as it advances its AI-enabled cell stress sensing platform and oncology pipeline. The round, led by Surveyor Capital with participation from new and existing investors, will fund IND-enabling work and early clinical trials for Soley’s lead acute myeloid leukemia (AML) program and a second solid-tumor asset, while also expanding non-oncology programs in neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases and scaling the platform. - learn more
LA Exits
- CareRev is being acquired by IntelyCare, which is combining its post-acute healthcare staffing platform with CareRev’s on-demand workforce marketplace for acute care. The deal creates one of the more comprehensive clinical labor platforms in the market, spanning clinician-facing job boards, internal resource pool tools, contingent labor and recruiter solutions to help health systems manage permanent and flexible staff in one place. Both brands will continue operating under their existing names while integrating offerings for hospitals, health systems and clinicians. - learn more
Read moreShow less
RELATEDTRENDING
LA TECH JOBS


