Musicians May Soon See Revenue from Spotify Podcasts
Sam primarily covers entertainment and media for dot.LA. Previously he was Marjorie Deane Fellow at The Economist, where he wrote for the business and finance sections of the print edition. He has also worked at the XPRIZE Foundation, U.S. Government Accountability Office, KCRW, and MLB Advanced Media (now Disney Streaming Services). He holds an MBA from UCLA Anderson, an MPP from UCLA Luskin and a BA in History from University of Michigan. Email him at samblake@dot.LA and find him on Twitter @hisamblake
Artists behind any of the 50 million-plus tracks featured on Spotify may start to see a new trickle of royalty revenues coming in starting Wednesday. The Swedish company has taken another step to expand its podcast offerings by drawing on its musical roots.
Podcasters using Spotify's podcast-creation tool Anchor, which the company acquired in early 2019, can now include songs from Spotify's extensive library in their podcasts. Just as artists receive royalties on their music streams, so too will they get paid for songs that appear in Spotify podcasts.
In addition to potentially helping artists earn a bigger royalty paycheck and offering podcasters new creative tools, the move also appears to be aimed at establishing Spotify as a go-to podcasting platform. The company is leveraging its existing licenses with rights holders such as record labels and publishers to give Anchor creators the new functionality.
Spotify subscribers will be able to hear the full tracks included in podcasts. Those using the free, ad-supported version will only hear a 30-second teaser. That, however, is the listening threshold at which royalty payments are triggered, so artists will benefit either way.
Podcasters using the tool can still use Anchor's sponsorship program to generate income through host-read ads, but the show must include at least 10 minutes of talking.
The feature will roll out in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia and New Zealand before potentially expanding elsewhere. As part of the release, Spotify has released seven shows that use the new format, including "Conspiracy Theories: Music Edition" and "60 Songs That Explain the 90s."
- Amazon and Google Sued by Reps of Legendary Songwriters - dot.LA ›
- TikTok Says it Will Pay Creators— and Universal Music Group - dot.LA ›
Subscribe to our newsletter to catch every headline.
Minutes into filling out my absentee ballot last week, I was momentarily distracted by my dog Seamus. A moment later, I realized in horror that I was filling in the wrong bubble — accidentally voting "no" on a ballot measure that I meant to vote "yes" on.
It was only a few ink marks, but it was noticeable enough. Trying to fix my mistake, I darkly and fully filled in the correct circle and then, as if testifying to an error on a check, put my initials next to the one I wanted.
Then I worried. As a reporter who has previously covered election security for years, I went on a mini-quest trying to understand how a small mistake can have larger repercussions.
As Los Angeles County's 5.6 million registered voters all receive ballots at home for the first time, I knew my experience could not be unique. But I wondered, would my vote count? Or would my entire ballot now be discarded?
My distractingly sweet dog, Seamus.
Photo by Tami Abdollah
Less than seven months after launching, the high-flying streaming service Quibi has shut down.
Despite a sold-out advertising slate, deals with A-listers and a $1.75 billion war chest from high-profile investors the former Disney executive and founder Jeffrey Katzenberg couldn't make the short-form mobile video platform stick.
- Quibi CEO Meg Whitman Sees a Renaissance in Hollywood - dot.LA ›
- Quibi May be Struggling With Advertisers - dot.LA ›
- Unboxing Quibi: Inside the New Mobile Streaming App and Its Shows ›
- Pegasus Tech Ventures' Anis Uzzaman On Why Quibi is Here to Stay ›
- Quibi Is Here: Will It Last? - dot.LA ›