How Amazon’s Treatment of Third-Party Sellers Became an Antitrust Target in California and Abroad

Monica Nickelsburg, GeekWire
Monica Nickelsburg is GeekWire’s Civic Editor, covering technology-driven solutions to urban challenges and the intersection of tech and politics. Before joining GeekWire, she worked for The Week, Forbes, and NBC. Monica holds a BA in journalism and history from New York University. Follow her @mnickelsburg and read her stories on GeekWire.
How Amazon’s Treatment of Third-Party Sellers Became an Antitrust Target in California and Abroad

Antitrust scrutiny of Amazon is intensifying as new details reveal how the company treats third-party sellers in its marketplace. Regulators in California, Washington state, and Europe are reportedly homing in on Amazon amid reports that the company uses its colossal size to compete directly with other retailers on Amazon.com.

The latest inquiries build on other investigations into Amazon's business practices, signaling that the company may have grown too powerful to escape regulatory oversight.


How did Amazon get here? By doing the same thing retailers have done for decades — with a big technology boost.

Amazon has been developing its own private label products for years, most visibly under the AmazonBasics name, and marketing them alongside products from third-party sellers. It's the same tactic deployed by big box stores and the reason you'll see Kroger-branded tissue sold for $1 less than the Kleenex brand on the shelf next to it.

The difference is the powerful technology that allows Amazon to supercharge insights about shoppers and sellers. Amazon captures 38.7% of online retail sales in the U.S., according to the latest data from eMarketer, and knows how often customers search for specific items and how well products are selling. Amazon also owns an increasingly large share of distribution for third-party retailers by offering logistics and delivery services.

Those advantages are drawing scrutiny from regulators in two states. California asked Amazon about whether it uses data on third-party sellers to inform its private label strategy, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Meanwhile, Amazon's home state, Washington, is looking into whether Amazon makes it difficult for retailers to sell their products on other websites, the New York Times reports. That question is the subject of several proposed class-action lawsuits over a now-defunct Amazon policy that kept third-party sellers from offering their products at a lower price than they did on Amazon.com.

The European Union is poised to bring charges against Amazon for anti-competitive behavior because of the company's private label strategy, according to the newspaper.

Amazon declined to comment on the latest developments but has defended its marketplace practices as industry standard in the past.

The Journal previously reported on Amazon employees using third-party seller data to develop in-house products that compete with those sellers. An Amazon lawyer told Congress last year, "We don't use individual seller data directly to compete with them." However, the newspaper's investigation revealed ways that even aggregated data could provide insights into top-selling third-party products in many instances.

Amazon is also under scrutiny by U.S. federal officials.The House antitrust subcommittee has been investigating Amazon's marketplace practices for months. After reports cast doubt on an Amazon attorney's testimony from last year, the subcommittee asked Jeff Bezos to testify. Amazon initially appeared reluctant but agreed to send Bezos "at a hearing with other CEOS this summer" in a letter to lawmakers reviewed by The New York Times.

The subcommittee is asking the CEOs of Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, and Facebook to testify this summer as part of a probe into big tech. The inquiry could result in a new approach to regulating competition in the U.S. The current regulatory framework has allowed the nation's largest technology companies to accumulate incredible wealth and power. That has progressive politicians and economists rethinking how the U.S. regulates competition.

This story first appeared on GeekWire.

Subscribe to our newsletter to catch every headline.

Cadence

Faraday Future Reveals Only 401 Pre-Orders For Its First Electric Car

David Shultz

David Shultz is a freelance writer who lives in Santa Barbara, California. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Outside and Nautilus, among other publications.

Faraday Future Reveals Only 401 Pre-Orders For Its First Electric Car
Courtesy of Faraday Future

Electric vehicle hopeful Faraday Future has had no shortage of drama—from alleged securities law violations to boardroom shake-ups—on its long and circuitous path to actually producing a car. And though the Gardena-based company looked to have turned a corner by recently announcing plans to launch its first vehicle later this year, Faraday’s quarterly earnings report this week revealed that demand for that car has underwhelmed—to say the least.

Read more Show less

Meet CropSafe, the Agtech Startup Helping Farmers Monitor Their Fields

David Shultz

David Shultz is a freelance writer who lives in Santa Barbara, California. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, Outside and Nautilus, among other publications.

Meet CropSafe, the Agtech Startup Helping Farmers Monitor Their Fields
Courtesy of CropSafe.

This January, John McElhone moved to Santa Monica from, as he described it, “a tiny farm in the absolute middle of nowhere” in his native Northern Ireland, with the goal of growing the crop-monitoring tech startup he founded.

It looks like McElhone’s big move is beginning to pay off: His company, CropSafe, announced a $3 million seed funding round on Tuesday that will help it develop and scale its remote crop-monitoring capabilities for farmers. Venture firm Elefund led the round and was joined by investors Foundation Capital, Global Founders Capital, V1.VC and Great Oaks Capital, as well as angel investors Cory Levy, Josh Browder and Charlie Songhurst. The capital will go toward growing CropSafe’s six-person engineering team and building up its new U.S. headquarters in Santa Monica.

Read more Show less

Cedars Sinai Health Ventures’ Maureen Klewicki on How Tech Is Changing Health Care

Minnie Ingersoll
Minnie Ingersoll is a partner at TenOneTen and host of the LA Venture podcast. Prior to TenOneTen, Minnie was the COO and co-founder of $100M+ Shift.com, an online marketplace for used cars. Minnie started her career as an early product manager at Google. Minnie studied Computer Science at Stanford and has an MBA from HBS. She recently moved back to L.A. after 20+ years in the Bay Area and is excited to be a part of the growing tech ecosystem of Southern California. In her space time, Minnie surfs baby waves and raises baby people.
Maureen Klewicki
Image courtesy of Maureen Klewicki

On this episode of the LA Venture podcast, Cedars Sinai Health Ventures’ Maureen Klewicki talks about price transparency for health care, the labor shortage crisis and emerging models of health care.

Read more Show less
RELATEDEDITOR'S PICKS
LA TECH JOBS
interchangeLA
Trending